I’ve never seen a product so proud of its artificiality.
From my Tuesday walk, here’s the exciting view from Nazareth St. as Sky 5 lifts off.
I heard a radio news report that a local BBQ chain had undertaken an “aggressive” PR campaign to get out the word that you can’t catch swine flu from eating pork. The media assault, as described by a spokesman for the company, included blogging about it on the company’s Web site, Tweeting about it and they posted something about it on its Facebook fan page.
I don’t know how many people check the restaurant’s blog (granted, there may be a spike in traffic with swine flu in the news). But the restaurant has 144 followers on Twitter and 293 fans on Facebook. Assuming there was no overlap between the Twitter followers and FB fans, that’s a grand total 437 people!
I dispute the reporter’s writing, calling it “aggressive” (I wouldn’t have used that actuality at all. Who cares?). But there’s another reminder here: As of April 2009, there’s a big difference between social media and mass media.
There are trends. There is movement.
But a big gap remains.
McGruff keeps following me around.
I picked this up off the 25-cent shelf at Reader’s Corner in Raleigh this weekend. I want to brush up on some of the stuff I remembered for the exam and promptly discarded as I walked out of class that last day.
This is a “programmed book.” It’s a fill-in-the-blank narrative. The authors assume you have no prior education in economics, and they give you context clues to fill in the blanks and learn the material.
It promises to teach a student in 12 hours what others learn in a seven-week course. The authors also claim that students who used the programmed book knew just as much as the people who took the long way.
Why have I never seen such a thing before? The book is from 1970, so maybe this method has been thoroughly discredited.
Or maybe it threatened to put too many professors out of work?
Hmmmmm.
Seen tonight on WFMY News 2.
I was digging through my archives here at the house and found this rare 1999 clip from the German TV talk show “Gabfest Haus.” It’s only 1:47. You can take it.
There’s a mediocre Twitter feed called Ruler of Tweets.
In the interest of disclosure, I’m indirectly associated with it. The goal was to create a daily Twitter rule to help guide people toward writing better Tweets. Well, as with all things related to media, generating content is easier said than done. As of now, it has stalled with 12 Tweet Rules, the most recent was posted April 1.
Here they are, in no particular order:
Well, it’s a start. We have/had good intentions.